One of the reasons the meeting went so long was that we all had a lot to share and say; the atmosphere was friendly and relaxed, yet professional. James has met all but one of his goals from last year, and we were all excited that the ground he gained opened up new areas for goals.
We hit a snag on the last goal, which was tied to behaviour in class. We discussed the heck out of that one and referred to a therapist's report and still had to adjourn without consensus. We all acknowledge there is a goal or two in there that needs work.
It reminds me of a dangling participle (or cliff hanger, if you are not fascinated with grammar):
"The antecedent—that is, the noun to which the participle refers—must be clear to the readers in order for them to understand what's being said. Otherwise, an action may be subscribed to the wrong player. That's called a 'dangling participle,' because it's left 'dangling' without a clear antecedent."
(Ta, USU!)

To be continued ... (like his IEP meeting)
No comments:
Post a Comment